Renumber AST nodes after expansion #9040
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…node has a unique id. Fixes numerous bugs in macro expansion and deriving. Add two representative tests. Fixes rust-lang#7971 Fixes rust-lang#6304 Fixes rust-lang#8367 Fixes rust-lang#8754 Fixes rust-lang#8852
|
Needs a rebase. (Also, looks like it fixes #7654; editing this into the PR message so that bors will close that issue automatically.) |
| fn fold_view_path_(@self, vp: &view_path_) -> view_path_ { | ||
| match *vp { | ||
| view_path_simple(ident, ref path, node_id) => { | ||
| view_path_simple(ident, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this call self.fold_ident(ident)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this call
self.fold_ident(ident)?
Yes, good catch.
|
never mind, I remember there was one bug I wanted to fix first |
Jarcho
pushed a commit
to Jarcho/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2022
…=dswij Add new lint [`positional_named_format_parameters`] *Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)* changelog: Add new lint [`positional_named_format_parameters`] to warn when named parameters in format strings are used as positional arguments.
Jarcho
pushed a commit
to Jarcho/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2022
Refactor `FormatArgsExpn`
It now for each format argument `{..}` has:
- The `Expr` it points to, and how it does so (named/named inline/numbered/implicit)
- The parsed `FormatSpec` (format trait/fill/align/etc., the precision/width and any value they point to)
- Many spans
The caller no longer needs to pair up arguments to their value, or separately interpret the `specs` `Expr`s when it isn't `None`
The gist is that it combines the result of [`rustc_parse_format::Parser`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_parse_format/struct.Parser.html) with the macro expansion itself
This unfortunately makes the code a bit longer, however we need to use both as neither have all the information we're after. `rustc_parse_format` doesn't have the information to resolve named arguments to their values. The macro expansion doesn't contain whether the positions are implicit/numbered/named, or the spans for format arguments
Wanted by rust-lang#9233 and rust-lang#8518 to be able to port the changes from rust-lang#9040
Also fixes rust-lang#8643, previously the format args seem to have been paired up with the wrong values somehow
changelog: [`format_in_format_args`]: Fix false positive due to misattributed arguments
r? `@flip1995`
cc `@nyurik`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After expansion, fold and renumber AST nodes to ensure that each AST node has a
unique id. Fixes numerous bugs in macro expansion and deriving. Add two
representative tests.
Fixes #7971
Fixes #6304
Fixes #8367
Fixes #8754
Fixes #8852
Fixes #7654
r? @brson